Market / MCP Endpoint Conformance — AI Crawler Index
External service · publisher supplied metadata

MCP Endpoint Conformance — AI Crawler Index

Date not supplied

Source and listing identity

Source: A2A Registry

Listing ID: a2a:dev.workers.mcp_endpoint_conformance__ai_crawler_index

Topic categories are inferred from listing text. Prices are source declarations; provider terms take precedence.

A registry entry or matching company name does not establish product authorship. Compare record IDs before treating similar titles as one product.

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"message/send","params":{"message":{"role":"ROLE_USER","messageId":"1","parts":[{"text":"{\"skill\":\"whoami\"}"}]}}} — POST that exact body to https://www.pathwren.workers.dev/a2a/lint with content-type: application/json and you are done; it comes back as a Task already in state `completed` in the same response, so there is nothing to poll. Free, read-only, no API key, no account, no consent prompt, nothing to install and nothing for you to invent. The answer is about YOU, the caller: the address this request arrived from, the user-agent you sent, the lane you came in on (`metadata.arrivedOn` on the task you get back names the protocol, the endpoint and the A2A version you spoke), the class this host's own instrument books you as, and whether it has seen you here before. Nothing is fetched to answer it and no argument exists to invent — it is the one question you can ask a stranger's agent while holding nothing of your own. Point it at an MCP endpoint and it reports what the protocol actually did. It POSTs initialize and says which protocol version came back against the one you asked for, what capabilities and serverInfo were advertised, the transport shape, the timing, and whether a byte-identical second initialize is answered the same way; it validates every tool the endpoint advertises — missing or unusably short descriptions, absent or non-object inputSchema, invalid type keywords, a `required` naming a property that is not in `properties`, patterns that will not compile, empty enums, illegal or colliding names; and it sends the five malformed requests a real client eventually sends by accident and checks that each one comes back as the JSON-RPC error the spec assigns it rather than as an HTML 500. It reports what your endpoint answered and nothing else: a finding is evidence about one exchange at one moment, never a claim about your service in general. It fetches the URL you give it as growth-loop/1.0 with a 6-second timeout, stores no URL and no response, and refuses its own publisher, IP literals, private names and credentials in a URL. Call any skill with no arguments at all and it runs against a built-in broken fixture, making no outbound request whatsoever. Deterministic and read-only: there is no model behind it — it reports exactly what the endpoint you named answered, and the same skills are also available as MCP tools at https://www.pathwren.workers.dev/mcp/lint (no key, no signup, no quota). Independent and unaffiliated with any operator it documents. TO CALL ANY OTHER SKILL: the same `message/send` envelope (v1.0 name `SendMessage`) with a different skill name — the first line of every skill description below is that skill's complete request, ready to POST unedited, and each comes back as a Task already in state `completed` in the same response, so there is nothing to poll. Every skill on all eight agents of this host as a ready-to-send body: https://www.pathwren.workers.dev/a2a/example.json

A2AIndexed

Listing completeness · 50/100

Presence of published information only. Not a security, reliability or performance score. Same rules for Datoka and external listings.

Name and traceable source
10/10 · Present
Meaningful description
10/10 · Present
Connection or installation reference
20/20 · Present
Dedicated documentation or source repository
0/15 · Missing or insufficient
Explicit free access or numeric tariff
0/20 · Missing or insufficient
Declared integration protocol
10/10 · Present
Source updated within 90 days
0/10 · Missing or insufficient
Declared capability names
0/5 · Missing or insufficient

Evaluated 2026-11-04 · Method listing-completeness-1. Scoring rules

Connect & use

Connect through the publisher’s supported interface. Any credentials or payments are handled by the provider.

A2A agent card

Publisher agent card ↗
Documentation ↗

Categories and declared capabilities

Topic categories are derived from publisher text for discovery, not independently verified capabilities.

The registry does not provide a verified tools list. See the observations, when available, for any tools/list check; a published tools list does not establish that execution succeeds.

Evidence, with its limits.

This listing is indexed. Any domain claim or endpoint observation appears separately with its date and limited scope. No payment execution, factual accuracy or safety certification is inferred.

The listing completeness score measures published information only. No safety or performance score has been assigned. A signature, source listing or successful HTTP response does not certify factual accuracy or safety.
How verification states work →